Wednesday, 11 June 2025

The garden and the pen: Lessons on consistency from nature

by Elikani

Every single day, my garden teaches me lessons I didn’t realise I needed.

When I plant a seed, I know I won't see results instantly. I water it, and I check on it - "Set it and forget it".

Some days, there’s visible growth. Most days, there isn’t. Yet still, I trust the process.

Oddly, when it comes to writing, I often forget this. I sit down with big plans, expecting perfect flow, instant output, and consistent motivation. When that doesn’t happen, my frustration grows. I tell myself maybe “I’m not disciplined enough” or “Maybe I’m just not a writer.”

But just like in the garden, consistency in writing isn't about daily perfection. It’s about small, repeated steps.

The Myth of Instant Growth

We live in a world addicted to speed. We see viral articles, bestselling books, and prolific creators and we assume they produce effortlessly. What we don’t see are the years of slow growth behind their success.

My garden reminds me that growth follows its own rhythm. There are seasons of planting, waiting, growing, and harvesting. Writing, or any creative pursuit, often follows similar seasons.

Showing Up Matters More Than Output

When I tend to my plants, I don't expect a harvest every day. Instead, I show up and care for what’s growing. Writing is the same. Some days I’ll write 1,000 words. Other days, 100 words will feel like a victory. By showing up consistently, I create space for progress to happen.

Imperfection Is Part of the Process

In gardening, not every plant thrives. Some seeds never germinate. Some plants wilt despite my best efforts. This doesn’t mean I’m a bad gardener. It Is simply part of the process, life personified.

In writing, drafts won’t always feel good. Some articles may resonate deeply, others may not. But every word written is part of my learning and growth.

Building My New Consistency Practice

Instead of forcing myself into rigid schedules, I’m adopting a gentler approach inspired by the garden:

  • Small sessions: Writing 2-3 times a week for 30–60 minutes.

  • Batching ideas: Keeping a running list of article topics to reduce decision fatigue.

  • Allowing imperfection: Focusing on progress, not perfection.

  • Reviewing seasons: Accepting that creative energy will ebb and flow.


Closing Thoughts

When I look at my thriving plants, I’m reminded that they grew not because I demanded perfection, but because I kept showing up. Fertilising, watering, pruning, tilling, until the process ends with a   harvest.

So too, I will approach my writing — like tending a garden, one day at a time.


A phenomenal view to wake up to daily.

Thursday, 6 November 2014

The "Twitterisation" of Investigative Journalism


Bongani Mtshwene
@B0ngzz
Journalism and new media have become very important allies of late and it is imperative to use social media as part of a new-age journalist’s day job. Personally I use Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr as platforms to express my views, both professionally and personally. Twitter is used to broadcast my views and analysis of news content to my followers in order to bring me closer to the masses. Facebook is used for lengthy analyses and news stories that can be put up which also works in tandem with my tumblr page where my blogs/news stories are put up.
The potential benefits using social media to collaborate audiences on investigative journalism projects are more recognition on a social platforms level e.g Barry Bateman – his Oscar trial tweets helped him gain followers on Twitter. Data collection is also a big factor as it draws an audience and keeps them clued up on current affairs. Your audience may even contribute to your story by means of opinions, analysis and even supporting evidence/eyewitness documents if needed.
Should a journalist tweet incorrect or false statements that are not verified there could be legal implications as this may lead up to a case of defamation or libel against the journalist. The journalist also stands a chance of losing his audience, his credibility and his career.

Journalists should act professional in the face of criticism; everybody is entitled to an opinion. They should only engage when they feel obligated to. Journalists should build on constructive criticism instead of brawling with trolls online. This will build confidence in the journalists work, this producing credibility.